[PATCH] low performance of lib/sort.c
authorkeios <keios.cn@gmail.com>
Tue, 3 Oct 2006 08:13:49 +0000 (01:13 -0700)
committerLinus Torvalds <torvalds@g5.osdl.org>
Tue, 3 Oct 2006 15:03:41 +0000 (08:03 -0700)
It is a non-standard heap-sort algorithm implementation because the index
of child node is wrong .  The sort function still outputs right result, but
the performance is O( n * ( log(n) + 1 ) ) , about 10% ~ 20% worse than
standard algorithm.

Signed-off-by: keios <keios.cn@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>
Acked-by: Zou Nan hai <nanhai.zou@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>

No differences found