[PATCH] proc: inode number fixlet
authorAlexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Sat, 2 Aug 2008 03:30:48 +0000 (07:30 +0400)
committerAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Mon, 25 Aug 2008 05:18:03 +0000 (01:18 -0400)
Ouch, if number taken from IDA is too big, the intent was to signal an
error, not check for overflow and still do overflowing addition.

One still needs 2^28 proc entries to notice this.

Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

No differences found