[S390] Small barrier() and cpu_relax() cleanup.
authorHeiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Mon, 5 Feb 2007 20:17:20 +0000 (21:17 +0100)
committerMartin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Mon, 5 Feb 2007 20:17:20 +0000 (21:17 +0100)
cpu_relax() has barrier() semantics hence there is no need to use both
of them in conjunction in sclp_sync_wait(). Also change cpu_relax()
so it's more obvious that it has barrier semantics.

Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>

No differences found