[PATCH] SCSI GFP fixes
authorAl Viro <viro@www.linux.org.uk>
Sun, 24 Apr 2005 19:28:34 +0000 (12:28 -0700)
committerLinus Torvalds <torvalds@ppc970.osdl.org>
Sun, 24 Apr 2005 19:28:34 +0000 (12:28 -0700)
Somebody forgot that | has higher priority than ?:.  As the result,
allocation is done with bogus flags - instead of GFP_ATOMIC + possibly
GFP_DMA we always get GFP_DMA and no GFP_ATOMIC.

Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>

No differences found