[SPARC64] mm: don't re-evaluate *ptep
authorHugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
Mon, 7 Nov 2005 22:08:46 +0000 (14:08 -0800)
committerDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Mon, 7 Nov 2005 22:08:46 +0000 (14:08 -0800)
sparc64 prom_callback and new_setup_frame32 each operates on a user page
table without holding lock, and no doubt they've good reason.  But I'd
feel more confident if they were to do a "pte = *ptep" and then operate
on pte, rather than re-evaluating *ptep.

Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

No differences found