We already have IFLA_IPTUN_ netlink attributes. The IP_TUN_ attributes look
very similar, yet they serve very different purpose. This is confusing for
anyone trying to implement a user space tool supporting lwt.
As the IP_TUN_ attributes are used only for the lightweight tunnels, prefix
them with LWTUNNEL_IP_ instead to make their purpose clear. Also, it's more
logical to have them in lwtunnel.h together with the encap enum.
Fixes:
3093fbe7ff4b ("route: Per route IP tunnel metadata via lightweight tunnel")
Signed-off-by: Jiri Benc <jbenc@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
#define LWTUNNEL_ENCAP_MAX (__LWTUNNEL_ENCAP_MAX - 1)
+enum lwtunnel_ip_t {
+ LWTUNNEL_IP_UNSPEC,
+ LWTUNNEL_IP_ID,
+ LWTUNNEL_IP_DST,
+ LWTUNNEL_IP_SRC,
+ LWTUNNEL_IP_TTL,
+ LWTUNNEL_IP_TOS,
+ LWTUNNEL_IP_SPORT,
+ LWTUNNEL_IP_DPORT,
+ LWTUNNEL_IP_FLAGS,
+ __LWTUNNEL_IP_MAX,
+};
+
+#define LWTUNNEL_IP_MAX (__LWTUNNEL_IP_MAX - 1)
#endif /* _UAPI_LWTUNNEL_H_ */