nilfs2: delete mark_inode_dirty in nilfs_new_inode
authorJiro SEKIBA <jir@unicus.jp>
Fri, 27 Nov 2009 10:41:06 +0000 (19:41 +0900)
committerRyusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Fri, 27 Nov 2009 11:05:15 +0000 (20:05 +0900)
It is redundant to call mark_inode_dirty() in nilfs_new_inode() because
all caller of nilfs_new_inode() will call mark_inode_dirty()
after calling nilfs_new_inode() directly or indirectly in transaction.

Signed-off-by: Jiro SEKIBA <jir@unicus.jp>
Signed-off-by: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@lab.ntt.co.jp>

No differences found