GFS2: Clean up of gdlm_lock function
authorSteven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
Mon, 29 Nov 2010 12:50:38 +0000 (12:50 +0000)
committerSteven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
Tue, 30 Nov 2010 10:31:48 +0000 (10:31 +0000)
The DLM never returns -EAGAIN in response to dlm_lock(), and even
if it did, the test in gdlm_lock() was wrong anyway. Once that
test is removed, it is possible to greatly simplify this code
by simply using a "normal" error return code (0 for success).

We then no longer need the LM_OUT_ASYNC return code which can
be removed.

Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>

No differences found