drbd: we should write meta data updates with FLUSH FUA
authorLars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>
Tue, 28 Jun 2011 11:22:48 +0000 (13:22 +0200)
committerPhilipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Thu, 30 Jun 2011 07:23:46 +0000 (09:23 +0200)
We used to write these with BIO_RW_BARRIER aka REQ_HARDBARRIER (unless
disabled in the configuration). The correct semantic now would be to
write with FLUSH/FUA.
For example, with activity log transactions, FUA alone is not enough, we
need the corresponding bitmap update (and all related application
updates) on stable storage as well.

Signed-off-by: Philipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>

No differences found