Don't mark_inode_dirty_sync() while holding lock
authorWeston Andros Adamson <dros@netapp.com>
Wed, 13 Apr 2011 14:53:51 +0000 (10:53 -0400)
committerTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Wed, 13 Apr 2011 17:15:51 +0000 (13:15 -0400)
mark_inode_dirty_sync() grabs the same inode lock!

race conditions between holding the lock in pnfs_set_layoutcommit() and in
mark_inode_dirty_sync() can result in a second call to pnfs_layoutcommit_inode(), but
this will be a noop as NFS_INO_LAYOUTCOMMIT won't be set in the second call

Signed-off-by: Weston Andros Adamson <dros@netapp.com>
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>

No differences found