nfsd4: release openowners on free in >=4.1 case
authorJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
Wed, 6 Jun 2012 16:53:48 +0000 (12:53 -0400)
committerJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
Tue, 10 Jul 2012 20:41:34 +0000 (16:41 -0400)
We don't need to keep openowners around in the >=4.1 case, because they
aren't needed to handle CLOSE replays any more (that's a problem for
sessions).  And doing so causes unexpected failures on a subsequent
destroy_clientid to fail.

We probably also need something comparable for lock owners on last
unlock.

Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>

No differences found