nfsd: fi_delegees doesn't need to be an atomic_t
authorJeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
Sat, 13 Dec 2014 14:11:40 +0000 (09:11 -0500)
committerJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
Wed, 7 Jan 2015 19:05:35 +0000 (14:05 -0500)
fi_delegees is always handled under the fi_lock, so there's no need to
use an atomic_t for this field.

Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>

No differences found