ring-buffer-benchmark: Fix the wrong sched_priority of producer
authorWang Long <long.wanglong@huawei.com>
Wed, 10 Jun 2015 08:12:37 +0000 (08:12 +0000)
committerBen Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
Thu, 6 Aug 2015 23:32:15 +0000 (00:32 +0100)
commit 108029323910c5dd1ef8fa2d10da1ce5fbce6e12 upstream.

The producer should be used producer_fifo as its sched_priority,
so correct it.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1433923957-67842-1-git-send-email-long.wanglong@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Wang Long <long.wanglong@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c

index a5457d5..6ad2e2d 100644 (file)
@@ -455,7 +455,7 @@ static int __init ring_buffer_benchmark_init(void)
 
        if (producer_fifo >= 0) {
                struct sched_param param = {
-                       .sched_priority = consumer_fifo
+                       .sched_priority = producer_fifo
                };
                sched_setscheduler(producer, SCHED_FIFO, &param);
        } else