um: wrong sigmask saved in case of multiple sigframes
authorAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Fri, 27 Apr 2012 03:25:06 +0000 (23:25 -0400)
committerAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Mon, 21 May 2012 18:20:27 +0000 (14:20 -0400)
we can't just find oldmask once; if there are multiple signals
and we loop building sigframes for those, ->saved_mask will be
definitely wrong for all but the first one.

Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

No differences found