locks: skip deadlock detection on FL_FILE_PVT locks
authorJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Mon, 3 Feb 2014 17:13:09 +0000 (12:13 -0500)
committerJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Mon, 31 Mar 2014 12:24:43 +0000 (08:24 -0400)
It's not really feasible to do deadlock detection with FL_FILE_PVT
locks since they aren't owned by a single task, per-se. Deadlock
detection also tends to be rather expensive so just skip it for
these sorts of locks.

Also, add a FIXME comment about adding more limited deadlock detection
that just applies to ro -> rw upgrades, per Andy's request.

Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
fs/locks.c

diff --cc fs/locks.c
Simple merge