btrfs: mirror_num should be int, not u64
authorJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
Sun, 20 Nov 2011 12:33:38 +0000 (07:33 -0500)
committerChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
Sun, 20 Nov 2011 12:42:14 +0000 (07:42 -0500)
My previous patch introduced some u64 for failed_mirror variables, this one
makes it consistent again.

Signed-off-by: Jan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
fs/btrfs/extent_io.h

Simple merge
Simple merge
Simple merge