um: fix races between line_open() and line_config()
authorAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Fri, 9 Sep 2011 23:14:02 +0000 (19:14 -0400)
committerRichard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Sat, 24 Mar 2012 23:29:53 +0000 (00:29 +0100)
Pull parse_chan_pair() call into setup_one_line(), under the mutex.
We really don't want open() to succeed before parse_chan_pair() had
been done (or after it has failed, BTW).  We also want "remove con<n>"
to free irqs, etc., same as "config con<n>=none".

Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>

No differences found