memcg: lru_size instead of MEM_CGROUP_ZSTAT
authorHugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Wed, 21 Mar 2012 23:34:19 +0000 (16:34 -0700)
committerLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Thu, 22 Mar 2012 00:55:00 +0000 (17:55 -0700)
I never understood why we need a MEM_CGROUP_ZSTAT(mz, idx) macro to
obscure the LRU counts.  For easier searching? So call it lru_size
rather than bare count (lru_length sounds better, but would be wrong,
since each huge page raises lru_size hugely).

Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name>
Acked-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

No differences found