[SCSI] libfc: don't swap OX_ID and RX_ID when sending BA_RJT

I saw an lport debug message from the exchange manager saying:
"lport  70500: Received response for out of range oxid:ffff"

A trace showed this was a BA_RJT sent due to an incoming ABTS
which arrived on an unknown exchange.  So, the sender of the
BA_RJT was in error, but in this case, both the initiator and
responder were the same machine.

The OX_ID and RX_ID should not have been reversed in this case.

Signed-off-by: Joe Eykholt <jeykholt@cisco.com>
Signed-off-by: Robert Love <robert.w.love@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@suse.de>