IB/ipath: Definitions of two RXE parity err bits were reversed
authorBryan O'Sullivan <bos@pathscale.com>
Thu, 15 Mar 2007 21:44:47 +0000 (14:44 -0700)
committerRoland Dreier <rolandd@cisco.com>
Thu, 19 Apr 2007 03:20:54 +0000 (20:20 -0700)
The chip documentation on the expected TID vs eager TID parity error
bits was reversed from what was implemented in the RTL, for both
chips.  This corrects the definitions.

Signed-off-by: Dave Olson <dave.olson@qlogic.com>
Signed-off-by: Bryan O'Sullivan <bryan.osullivan@qlogic.com>
Signed-off-by: Roland Dreier <rolandd@cisco.com>

No differences found