locking-selftests: Handle unexpected failures more strictly
authorMaarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com>
Thu, 20 Jun 2013 11:31:51 +0000 (13:31 +0200)
committerIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Wed, 26 Jun 2013 10:10:59 +0000 (12:10 +0200)
When CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING is not enabled, more tests are
expected to pass unexpectedly, but there no tests that should
start to fail that pass with CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING enabled.

Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org
Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org
Cc: daniel@ffwll.ch
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20130620113151.4001.77963.stgit@patser
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

No differences found