btrfs: lower the dirty balance poll interval
authorWu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Fri, 16 Dec 2011 17:32:57 +0000 (12:32 -0500)
committerChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
Fri, 16 Dec 2011 17:32:57 +0000 (12:32 -0500)
Tests show that the original large intervals can easily make the dirty
limit exceeded on 100 concurrent dd's. So adapt to as large as the
next check point selected by the dirty throttling algorithm.

Signed-off-by: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>

No differences found