[ARM] gic: Fix gic cascade irq handling
authorRussell King <rmk@dyn-67.arm.linux.org.uk>
Thu, 17 May 2007 09:11:34 +0000 (10:11 +0100)
committerRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
Thu, 17 May 2007 09:11:34 +0000 (10:11 +0100)
No need for the cascade irq function to have a "fastcall" annotation.
Fix the range checking for valid IRQ numbers - comparing the value
returned by the GIC with NR_IRQS is meaningless since we translate
the GIC irq number to a Linux IRQ number afterwards.

Check the GIC returned IRQ number is within limits first, then add
the IRQ offset, and only then compare with NR_IRQS.

Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>

No differences found